Laura is miles better in my opinion. Tried BB today at Selfridges and was shocked at how awful the shades were. Tried the lightest shade and it was too white and chalky and the second lightest was very very yellow. Was with a friend who is a professional make up artist and we both said it was not up to scratch. Shame as I do like their foundations.
I have the regular (non-oil free) version of the new BB Tinted moisturizer, and I find the Light to Medium Tint is better for my skin tone than the LM Sand TM. I also prefer the texture of the BB. That, and Perricone No Foundation Foundation, although that comes in only one shade.
8 comments:
so...if money was not an object which TM would you choose? Bobbi or Laura (or another?) And have you tried Estee Lauder Day Wear Plus?
I can't decide.. probably back to LM, but they are so even in quality I think I wouldn't mind which.
Laura is miles better in my opinion. Tried BB today at Selfridges and was shocked at how awful the shades were. Tried the lightest shade and it was too white and chalky and the second lightest was very very yellow. Was with a friend who is a professional make up artist and we both said it was not up to scratch. Shame as I do like their foundations.
I've tried the Laura Mercier and love that one. How is the coverage on the BB? Does it offer any at all?
Hi Product Doctor: yes, I think the coverage is on a par to LM x
thanks!
I have the regular (non-oil free) version of the new BB Tinted moisturizer, and I find the Light to Medium Tint is better for my skin tone than the LM Sand TM. I also prefer the texture of the BB. That, and Perricone No Foundation Foundation, although that comes in only one shade.
I prefer BB. Laura Mercier's TM contains Ethylhexyl Palmitate which caused me to breakout.
Post a Comment