Thursday 25 March 2010

9 comments:

Unknown said...

Interesting piece.
Thanks for flagging this up.
You're right about beauty bloggers too xx

Colin said...

I agree with you in general and any stick with which to beat the Mail is a good stick. But strictly speaking, they are two different formulations that they are talking about.

Anonymous said...

Was there an ad for Nivea Visage in the Daily Mail? Maybe Nivea paid to advertise knowing they were getting a bit of an editorial nod. Is the publication obligated to tell the advertiser whether it will be a positive vs. negative review?

britishbeautyblogger said...

Hi Colin - yes agreed two different products but same message re the brand. Anon - I didn't buy the paper; saw it on line so not sure whether there were ads...Nivea will be livid that's for sure.

Unknown said...

I don't trust much what people on Daily Mail write anyway, I just read it for the fun - online.

mizzworthy said...

So funny!

teresa-xo said...

boo to the papers!

the online blogging/beauty community has my vote!

xx

Unknown said...

And this is why when I want to know which ingredients actually work (tested using scientific method) I read Beauty Brains... Thanks for flagging this.

lynne said...

It has 4 active ingredients not 3; (apparently 5 sunfilters)and we all know that the worst contributor to ageing is UV (followed closely by genetic disposition)
At £10 it is cheap, what do we expect?? As a sunscreen it is formulated to be waterproof, the mineral oil/silicones will also seal moisture in the skin (result plumping)
Skin Function and cell renewal mostly happens at night (when you dont wear a sunscreen!) I am no fan of Nivea but why knock it ?